Opposites attract

Sarah Vine and Michael Gove.

What the hell do these two talk about over dinner?  She's writing articles in The Times about black opaque tights; he's scrapping the system to expand free school meals to children living in poverty.  My mind is boggled.  Perhaps that chirrup on about their kids the whole time?

I love reading about fashion.  Not all of it and not all the time but it's a perennial interest of mine.  Sarah Vine is not as good as Jess Cartner-Morley in The Grauniad because JCM knows that ordinary people outside of the journalistic/political bubble exist and not only that, we don't need to be patronised. Vine, on the other hand, actually thinks her readership need to have it explained to them that a 3-pack of 60 denier opaques from Marks is better value than one pair for twice the price from Wolford.

Thanks for that, Mrs. Gove.  I couldn't do the arithmetic before.  I can see why you are married to the Educational Secretary.

Spending review: ...now a sharp scratch

I've had numerous needles stuck in me during the past year and the phlebotomist/medic always says the same thing - 'Sharp scratch'. If they're skilled and confident at what they are doing, it's just that; if they aren't, it would be more accurate to say 'And now I am going to stick something in you that feels as though it's been recycled many times and I'm going to wiggle it round when it's in your arm'. I have a feeling that the spending review will feel as though it's in the former group when in reality, it's in the latter.

Billions of pounds lopped off departmental budgets is going to hurt like a bastard eventually but the world won't fall apart during the next 24 hours. Instead, it heralds the beginning of a slow decline in services and infrastructure for the UK. Posts may not be made redundant en masse but retiring colleagues, colleagues with new jobs outside the organisation or seconded out or moving departments may not be replaced. For some people, it will be a case of looking round a half-empty office in a year's time and realising that the reason they are working an extra 10 hours a week to stand still is because nowadays they ARE the team.

A friend said to me last week-end that she predicted the outright closure of some smaller universities given the size of the savings target set for the Department of Education. So look out Winchester University and Whatsit College in Cleethorpes: your days are numbered. Surely it would make more sense to take a league table of universities and just stop funding the bottom third of it? Harsh but any less fair than keeping open the remaining two departments of Scumbag College so that 100 students a year can be educated? I don't know how robust the Sunday Times annual league table is but if the results bear any relation to reality, then the University of West London, nee Thames Valley University, needn't bother opening it's doors this Monday.

Alternatively, the ConDems could stop this insanity, realise that decent quality education is what we should be aiming for and start expanding and funding courses that add something to the skill level or sum total of human knowledge in this country? Something that I don't believe for one minute you get when every Further Education College in the country has been turned into a university. I'm not arguing for a return to Brideshead Revisited but less mediocrity and meaningless degrees would not go amiss.

Cleggy is smiling now...

The one and only time that I voted Lib Dem. I can say that for certain: never voted for them before and never voting for them again.

What is the point? I may a well have voted for the Tories direct. If the LDs haven't even got a referendum about a PR system out of the deal and Vince Cable has to look at that idiot Osborne as Chancellor, then I am not so sure they have cut themselves a good deal.

Oh well. £6bn of cuts heading our way very soon and the LDs are going to be tarred with the same brush which looks like political suicide to me. If I was a Labour Party MP, I'd be sighing with relief.